The Trump Kids

November 27, 2017

President Trump’s children from three marriages have gotten more attention than most offspring of a chief executive, especially the oldest “kids”- Eric, Donald and Ivanka, and the other “kid” by marriage, Jared Kushner. If there is a common thread that links the Trump family is that dad named his children from his marriage to Ivana to high profile campaign and later White House positions with vague job descriptions and questionable authority. One year into his presidency and the Trump “kids” have added little of value to their dad’s administration and more importantly are a national embarrassment.

Eric, the so-called smart one, has stayed away from government and is running the family business, which by most accounts has declined in net worth and brand recognition. Donald Jr., often described as the weak one much like Fredo from the Godfather saga, could likely be headed for the big house as the Russian collusion investigation moves forward. Ivanka, the well-dressed one, doesn’t really have a role, except to look beautiful and serve as a good-will ambassador to far away places. Jared, the presidential adviser, has been described by many in and out of conservative circles as the ” worst adviser to a president in recent memory.” Tiffany, the daughter of Marla Maples, is in law school and appears to have no interest in even being shown in photos standing next to deal ol’ dad, and Baron, the son of Melania and Trump, is a real kid, kind of a lost boy living in the White House.

Usually the family members of a president stay out of the limelight or follow their own career caring little to be associated with the mess that is Washington politics. But it is clear that President Trump sees his administration as a family business where his children use their positions to make money. It’s growing increasingly obvious that the Trump presidency is about using government and public policy to increase the bottom line or at the minimum to make friends in the corporate world who will owe their good fortune to Donald and the “kids.”

The Trump presidency and the family business is so much like many of the authoritarian regimes in Latin America,the Middle East and Africa where dictators rely on their gaggle of relatives to ensure trust and obedience in exchange for a cut of the wealth generated by government control and influence. Democratic values are unimportant and a drain on money making; a mix of capitalism and nepotism are what drives government.

What is a problem for President Trump and the “kids” is that although weakened this country still has an independent judiciary and functioning law enforcement agencies led by honorable men and women who still believe in the rule of law. It will be interesting to see how long the “kids” benefit from the power of their dad. It would be nice, though, to see the kids return to real estate and selling shoes.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Who Shot JFK?

October 23, 2017

President Trump’s decision to release over 3,000 pages of still classified documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy is sure to restart the debate over who killed the President that sad day in Dallas. Over 40,000 books have already been published on President Kennedy, most on the question, ” Who Killed the President?” This release of the documents is certain to get the presses rolling again on new conspiracy books. Talk about a cottage industry.

The debate over the Kennedy assassination intensified over the years as many Americans did not believe the Warren Commission report that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone; in fact currently polls point to nearly 60% of Americans who believe that Oswald was part of a larger conspiracy. The conspirators include the Mafia, the CIA, the military, the Cubans, the FBI, the Russians and a whole host of shady characters with ties to right-wing groups and anti-Kennedy haters. Despite the scientific work of forensic experts who examined the bullets, police radio transmissions, the path of the shots from the Texas Book Depository and the now famous Zapruder video, the conclusion was that there was only one shooter with one rifle ( no mysterious second shooter on the grassy knoll ).

And yet now over 50 years later there are still doubts about “Who Killed JFK?” It is always difficult for many Americans to come to the conclusion that one man acting alone was behind the murder of the century, so these documents may shed light on the unanswered questions that the Warren Commission failed to address or hid from public view. But don’t count on any new blockbusters, just more conspiracy talk that will fill the airwaves and the Internet. What the documents will do is just rekindle the assassination talk and disappoint those who feel that Oswald couldn’t have acted alone.

But if you are an anti-Trumper you will certainly see the President’s decision to release the documents as another savvy ploy to keep the media and the American people occupied instead of turning their attention to Russian meddling, sexual harassment, Obamacare, tax policy,  dead soldiers in Niger,and white supremacy. Americans love a conspiracy more than the dismal details of legislation, law suits, electioneering, and the dark side of our national psyche.

Maybe the mafia, the CIA or the Cubans did conspire to kill John Kennedy but what would such information ( certainly not incontrovertible proof) do other than further erode confidence in government? It is better to think about the loss of a promising and visionary president cut down in the prime of his life.

 


The 25 Issues That Shape American Politics

October 16, 2017

IMG_1968


The Generals

October 10, 2017

This country has been fortunate to have distinguished military leaders as presidents, cabinet officials and heads of our national security system. These men have often brought a patriotic spirit, a commitment to public life, organizational skills and personal discipline to their positions in our government. From George Washington to Dwight Eisenhower to George H. W. Bush military training and wartime service shaped their leadership and decision-making capabilities.

Today during the Trump administration the military men that serve as his closest advisers are being called upon to function in a manner that requires a different type of leadership style and decision-making skill. Generals Kelly, Mattis and McMaster are basically charged with reining in an impulsive, petty, juvenile and grudge-holding chief executive.

The more we hear about the Trump generals it appears that they are the last line of defense against chaos and gross miscalculation. When the generals first signed up for service in the White House they didn’t think that they would be responsible for saving the country from a completely unqualified leader of the free world. Of course no one forced them to accept their jobs, but they likely saw the new president as a change agent who was committed to “Making American Great.”

But months into their jobs, it is clear that Kelly, Mattis and McMaster have come to realize they have an enormous responsibility to “Make America Safe.” Whether it is North Korea, Iran, Russia, or any other international hot spot that gets the president to start a new tweet storm, the generals have become the voices of reason and caution. Although at this time there is no definitive proof of “quiet collusion” among the generals, I suspect that there are midnight calls among the three on how to “Keep America Safe” and convince Trump from taking this country into the abyss. Already there are signs that the generals’ have decided that frequent policy reviews, delay in decision-making, control of Oval Office access, and some much needed staff house cleaning are the best means of avoiding chaos and gross miscalculation.

What will be interesting and at the same time dangerous is what happens if we enter impeachment mode or the Republican leadership decides that it is time to use the 25th Amendment and push Trump out of office. How will the generals respond to the political processes in place or will they take the lead in actually pushing their boss out the door?  If the Republicans continue to accept the status quo with the hope that the child president will change, will the generals do the dirty work? We have never really had a Latin American style palace coup in this country, but if the chaos and miscalculation continues and the president takes us into the abyss, will the generals move from advisers to a military junta? Keep your eye on the generals.

 


President Trump – Day 139

June 7, 2017

Well here we are at day 139 of the Trump presidency and to paraphrase Betty Davis, “fasten your seat belts, it’s going to be a bumpy night.” And I might add a ” bumpy day and afternoon as well.” Unless you are completely apolitical, apathetic and an alien from another planet far, far away it is impossible to go through 24 hours without someone or some entity offering their opinion, their support or their anger regarding the 45th President of the United States.

So at Day 139 let me add my humble two cents worth about the Trump Presidency:

  1. Trump remains as he always was a businessman, not a politician, government official or for that matter a leader of the country and the free world. It is becoming increasing clear that Trump is in this for the national and international connections that will advance his family business and payback his financial backers, i.e. Russia. Sure he can be described as ” unconventional’ but only “unconventional” in that he is not in office to ” preserve and protect” the Constitution or to unify the country. His presidency is a business deal, plain and simple.
  2. For those naive liberals who pray nightly for impeachment or the implementation of the 25th Amendment, dream on. The Republicans in the House and Senate are determined to put up with the 6th grade tweets, the staff chaos, the ill-advised sleights to key allies and the almost daily examples that their guy is not ready for prime time because they believe he can weather the storm and sign legislation on health care, taxes, banking and regulation. It may be a deal with the devil but there is no evidence that the GOP is ready to abandon the President.
  3. Get ready for the long haul. Should a smoking gun about obstruction of justice or ties to Russia prove legitimate, the process of dealing with the alleged charges will take months if not years to reach some sort of conclusion. The Democrats may win back some seats in the House and Senate but probably not enough to change the political landscape. Right now there is no evidence that Republican leaders will march into the Oval Office and demand that Trump return to Florida or New York and resume his real estate business, and of course Trump is stubborn and arrogant enough to show them the door.
  4. The Resistance Movement is kind of petering out. Yes there are demonstrations and late night hosts are pumping up their ratings and giving new meaning to sarcasm and satire. But we are a long way away from a peoples’ rebellion as most of what Trump does has little impact on the everyday lives of most Americans. Being an embarrassment, a clown, and a fool is to many Americans what politicians have become in this country – Trump is no different, just worse.
  5. The real danger of Trump is to our democracy, the chipping away of freedom of the press, civil rights, voting integrity, protections for dissent, toleration of differences and the quiet acceptance of bigotry and hate. The refusal of Americans to see this threat to democracy is the most disheartening characteristic of the national political culture in the last 139 days. Core American values have taken a back seat to attacks on political correctness and vacant claims of making America great again. Lady Liberty’s torch has lost its flame.

The next 139 days of the Trump presidency will likely be critical to his future, and that of the Republican Party, American democracy and the soul of our great republic. It is important for every American to pay attention and realize that what happens in the next 139 days does impact their lives. I only hope that God does bless America.


Daddy’s Woman

April 6, 2017

It is not unusual for Presidents of the United States to offer key positions in their administration to family members – Eleanor Roosevelt was a valued advisor to her husband, Kennedy gave brother Bobby the Attorney General portfolio, and Clinton tasked Hillary with trying to get his health care bill off the ground. So when Donald Trump brings his daughter Ivanka into his inner circle it is not cause for outrage or even charges of nepotism.  Trump trusts his daughter and apparently values her counsel.

As for Ivanka, she has told anyone who will listen that her goal is to quietly talk with her father and advance policy issues that are on her agenda such as parental leave, women’s pay and matters related to children. This may be true and hopefully she can influence her father on these key domestic issues. I am not convinced.

What worries me is that Ivanka’s advice and agenda, while worthy, seems misplaced. Perhaps she has talked to dear old dad about stupid tweets, perpetuating lies and gross exaggerations, supporting serial sexual harassers, and making unsubstantiated charges that weaken his already declining reputation and popularity, but if she has talked to him about his self-defeating behavior, her counsel is empty and routinely ignored.

There are two possible reasons for Ivanka in the White House – the President likes having her around and she enjoys all the attention that can advance her brand. Ivanka in the White House is not about advancing specific policies but rather protecting Trump Inc. and dear old dad. Ivanka to her credit is a far more attractive face of the Trump presidency; she speaks with more than a six grade vocabulary; her clothes actually fit her; and she is clearly smart and poised. – all those qualities missing from her father. She is not, however, an advisor or counselor or quiet force for change.

President Trump can pretty much bring into the White House who he wants, but Ivanka is more like administrative eye candy and guardian of the brand than a key cog in the governing arena. Until this country sees policies that makes the lives of Americans better, Ivanka will just validate the President’s phony effort to show in his words that he “loves women”, but not women who make a difference.

 

 

 


Branding the USA

March 8, 2017

Americans it is fair to say are brand conscious. Many of us not only know the name of consumer products but we also likely know what the logo looks like, i.e. those golden arches of McDonald’s or the “swoosh” of Nike. Branding becomes important to a company as it is a symbol of a reputation built up over the years. Brands connote excellence, reliability, innovation, creativity and of course market share. Corporations pay a great deal of attention to brand and branding as it is one critical key to profits and growth.

Although we often don’t think of governments and countries having a brand, the concept of a national brand does apply just as it does in the corporate sector. Our brand has in the past been based in freedom, equality, opportunity, tolerance, justice, power and wealth. Now a nation like the United States can’t maintain all aspects of its brand since circumstances change, priorities are reconfigured and most importantly democratic politics can remake a brand.

The United States is currently going through a re-branding process and it is not a pretty sight.President Trump with his 3 am tweets, his choice of advisors and cabinet members, his controversial policies, and his determination to change the rules of politics has changed the American brand, and not for the better.

There is a mountain of evidence that those outside the United States think differently about our brand or at least are confused about what we stand for as a nation. Long time allies are deeply concerned over whether we are a dependable friend, tourists are thinking twice about whether to vacation here, multinational companies are worried about the future of trade and investment, and those new to our country, legal and illegal, are fearful for their futures, if not their lives. It was probably a prank, but the Statue of Liberty went dark for awhile the other day- a symbol of our brand without the promises associated with that beautiful torch.

As any marketing executive will tell you, once you change your brand or worse yet once your brand takes a hit, market share is in trouble. Customers loose confidence; they wonder whether the product of the past is the same today. Branding changes become especially dangerous if the new brand presents a negative image and tells the buyer that all is not well.

President Trump and his minions can be criticized on a number of miscues, false starts and simply stupid policies. But what is most bothersome to me is that they have sullied the American brand and in the process remade this United States into a less attractive country with a less attractive set of values and principles.

Getting back to the old brand of the United States will be difficult and will take a long period of time. Confidence has to be restored, old values and principles have to be re-introduced into the body politics, Lady Liberty’s torch has to shine bright again. Remember when Coca-Cola changed its soda recipe and introduced the New Coke? To say the least it was a disaster. We are going the way of Coca-Cola with a dangerous branding process. Hopefully wiser heads will push the President back to the old United States of America, the country that actually stood for something rather than using the brand to make a buck.